The Boxing Palace
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

+8
gomez1012
Groundhog
UBeeg9cats
Gumby
flapanther2001
hardcorebee24
SlickMoney
GrantZilla
12 posters

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  GrantZilla Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:07 am

The date and site of Showtime’s Super Six World Boxing Classic final has yet to be decided but one aspect of the anticipated showdown between Andre Ward and Carl Froch has been determined:

The two 168-pound standouts will fight for the vacant RING super middleweight title whenever they do meet in the ring.

Every member of THE RING’s Ratings Advisory Panel who contributed this week strongly advised that Carl Froch be elevated above Lucian Bute based on superior opposition,” said Nigel Collins, Editor-in-Chief of THE RING magazine. “They made an excellent case, as there is no comparison between Froch’s three most recent adversaries (Glen Johnson, Arthur Abraham, Mikkel Kessler) and Bute’s (Brian Magee, Jesse Brinkley, Edison Miranda). Therefore, the Editorial Board is in full agreement with the Advisory Panel.”

http://ringtv.craveonline.com/blog/167635-ring-ratings-update-froch-advances-to-no-2-super-middleweight
GrantZilla
GrantZilla

Posts : 9310
Join date : 2010-11-05

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  SlickMoney Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:11 am

Grant at the crib

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Popshot
SlickMoney
SlickMoney

Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-03-06

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  GrantZilla Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:17 am

SlickMoney wrote:Grant at the crib

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Popshot

Heh funny. Come on, even you Slick got to agree with this

GrantZilla
GrantZilla

Posts : 9310
Join date : 2010-11-05

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  SlickMoney Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:17 am

How come this is for the Ring title and Bradley vs Alexander wasnt? Did Froch beating Glen Johnson really warrant him to leap frog Bute? NO!

They should've kept Bute at 2. Winner of Froch-Ward ,to me, is not the clear cut man at 168.
SlickMoney
SlickMoney

Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-03-06

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  SlickMoney Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:18 am

GrantZilla wrote:
SlickMoney wrote:Grant at the crib

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Popshot

Heh funny. Come on, even you Slick got to agree with this


Nope
SlickMoney
SlickMoney

Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-03-06

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  hardcorebee24 Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:29 am

SlickMoney wrote:How come this is for tthe he Ring title and Bradley vs Alexander wasnt? Did Froch beating Glen Johnson really warrant him to leap frog Bute? NO!

They should've kept Bute at 2. Winner of Froch-Ward ,to me, is not the clear cut man at 168.

I agree. What justifies a number two ranking when you beat the eighth ranked fighter in the division? It seems ring is desperate to fill championship vacancies. They currently have eleven vacancies. Its also great Publicity to present the winner of the super six with a ring belt. I think this is irresponsible on the part of the ring.
hardcorebee24
hardcorebee24

Posts : 3310
Join date : 2010-10-24

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  GrantZilla Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:47 am

Jesus christ. There's no fucking winning with some of you.

Bute was lucky he kept his # 2 position for as long as he has with the compition he's faced.

Froch by far has one of the best resumes at Super Middle. His only loss against Kessler could have gone either way.

And a Froch fan like you Hardcorebee who's keeps banging the drum on how underrated Froch is and how he has the best resume, is now saying it's irresponsible for Froch to be ranked at # 2?

So fighting Brian Magee, Jesse Brinkley, and Edison Miranda trumps Glen Johnson, Arthur Abraham, and Mikkel Kessler?

Seriously. Fucking pointless with some of you
GrantZilla
GrantZilla

Posts : 9310
Join date : 2010-11-05

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  hardcorebee24 Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:01 am

GrantZilla wrote:Jesus christ. There's no fucking winning with some of you.

Bute was lucky he kept his # 2 position for as long as he has with the compition he's faced.

Froch by far has one of the best resumes at Super Middle. His only loss against Kessler could have gone either way.

And a Froch fan like you Hardcorebee who's keeps banging the drum on how underrated Froch is and how he has the best resume, is now saying it's irresponsible for Froch to be ranked at # 2?

So fighting Brian Magee, Jesse Brinkley, and Edison Miranda trumps Glen Johnson, Arthur Abraham, and Mikkel Kessler?

Seriously. Fucking pointless with some of you

Then they shouldn't have had Bute there in the first place, but they did and Froch beat other ranked opponents before fighting Johnson. Bute ko'd his last three opponents so I assume the fashion in which he beat his opponents garnered him the ranking
hardcorebee24
hardcorebee24

Posts : 3310
Join date : 2010-10-24

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  hardcorebee24 Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:04 am

Just seems awfully convenient if you ask me.
hardcorebee24
hardcorebee24

Posts : 3310
Join date : 2010-10-24

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  GrantZilla Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:06 am

hardcorebee24 wrote: It seems ring is desperate to fill championship vacancies. They currently have eleven vacancies. Its also great Publicity to present the winner of the super six with a ring belt.

If anything, the are too anal about filling vacancies. If they werre so desperate, they'd made Bradley-Alexander for the belt, but wisely didn't.

And what publicity? Showtime and HBO rarely, and in HBO's case, never mentioned The Ring. They'll mention Ward's "Super WBA" bullshit belt, and Froch's WBC trinket over The Ring belt.
GrantZilla
GrantZilla

Posts : 9310
Join date : 2010-11-05

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  GrantZilla Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:09 am

hardcorebee24 wrote:Just seems awfully convenient if you ask me.

There's no winning. Because they're would be just as many people bitching that Ward-Froch wasn't for The Ring belt. And try to tie some GB conspiracy to it all.

Bute didn't deserve # 2 spot off his resume. And the Super-Six winner will fight Bute anways, unless Bute loses to Kessler, which is possible.

GrantZilla
GrantZilla

Posts : 9310
Join date : 2010-11-05

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  SlickMoney Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:09 am

I think Kessler was 1 and Bute was 2 before the Super Six started. He hasnt looked shitty since then. Froch caught an L. Beating old man Johnson really isnt much if you really think about it.
SlickMoney
SlickMoney

Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-03-06

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  hardcorebee24 Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:14 am

GrantZilla wrote:
hardcorebee24 wrote:Just seems awfully convenient if you ask me.

There's no winning. Because they're would be just as many people bitching that Ward-Froch wasn't for The Ring belt. And try to tie some GB conspve iracy to it all.

Bute didn't deserve # 2 spot off his resume. And the Super-Six winner will fight Bute anways, unless Bute loses to Kessler, which is possible.


Theyve had him there for 20 months know he wouldn't/couldn't fight a super six fighter. What's this about winning?
Im not trying to win or lose just stating opinion.
hardcorebee24
hardcorebee24

Posts : 3310
Join date : 2010-10-24

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  GrantZilla Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:22 am

SlickMoney wrote:I think Kessler was 1 and Bute was 2 before the Super Six started. He hasnt looked shitty since then. Froch caught an L. Beating old man Johnson really isnt much if you really think about it.

Johnson better then anyone Bute has faced. And isn't it about competion over wins and losses. The Kessler loss could've gone either way. Not as incriminating as Bute literaly being saved from a loss by the ref against Andrade.

Add on Froch traveled out his comfortzone of his town, same can't be said of Bute.

I never agreed with The Ring for keeping him as high as they have.

GrantZilla
GrantZilla

Posts : 9310
Join date : 2010-11-05

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  hardcorebee24 Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:29 am

GrantZilla wrote:
SlickMoney wrote:I think Kessler was 1 and Bute was 2 before the Super Six started. He hasnt looked shitty since then. Froch caught an L. Beating old man Johnson really isnt much if you really think about it.

Johnson better then anyone Bute has faced. And isn't it about competion over wins and losses. The Kessler loss could've gone either way. Not as incriminating as Bute literaly being saved from a loss by the ref against Andrade.

Add on Froch traveled out his comfortzone of his town, same can't be said of Bute.

I never agreed with The Ring for keeping him as high as they have.


But they did. Now it seems convenient that they're going to change that to make the final for their belt. Shouldn't Montial Domaire been for the belt? They were the two best in the bantam weight division and Ring stuck yo their guns about that.
hardcorebee24
hardcorebee24

Posts : 3310
Join date : 2010-10-24

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  GrantZilla Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:51 am

hardcorebee24 wrote: But they did. Now it seems convenient that they're going to change that to make the final for their belt. Shouldn't Montial Domaire been for the belt? They were the two best in the bantam weight division and Ring stuck yo their guns about that.

Donaire was ranked 5th when he fought Montiel. His compition before the Montiel fight was weak to the point they were nothing but sparring sessions, like when he was practicing being a lefty against the likes of Hernan Marquez.

Froch's resume speaks for itself. Since 2008 he's fought Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell, Kessler, Abraham, and Johnson.

Bute since 2008 fought Andrade(which was saved by the ref), Zuniga, Andrade again, Brinkley, and Magee
GrantZilla
GrantZilla

Posts : 9310
Join date : 2010-11-05

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  hardcorebee24 Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:11 am

GrantZilla wrote:
hardcorebee24 wrote: But they did. Now it seems convenient that they're going to change that to make the final for their belt. Shouldn't Montial Domaire been for the belt? They were the two best in the bantam weight division and Ring stuck yo their guns about that.

Donaire was ranked 5th when he fought Montiel. His compition before the Montiel fight was weak to the point they were nothing but sparring sessions, like when he was practicing being a lefty against the likes of Hernan Marquez.

Froch's resume speaks for itself. Since 2008 he's fought Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell, Kessler, Abraham, and Johnson.

Bute since 2008 fought Andrade(which was saved by the ref), Zuniga, Andrade again, Brinkley, and Magee
:

Believe me I understand that. Donaire was the favorite still going into that fight why couldn't they make an exception knowing he was superior?. Bute was fighting bums and Andrade for a long time. Why is he even ranked third? Froch should have been ranked higher than Bute since his win over Taylor. Taylor was better than Bute's opponents. They're making an exception here because of the tournament. They're leap frogging Froch because they want to. According to Ring Bute should not lose his ranking, he's been active and he's been winning in devastating fashion and hasn't showed weaknesses, in fact he's gotten better. Beating the eighth ranked opponent does not warrant a jump in ranking.
hardcorebee24
hardcorebee24

Posts : 3310
Join date : 2010-10-24

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  GrantZilla Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:46 am

Fighters have lost ranking position do to inferior competion.

Got same thing going on at Bantam. There are people complaining about Moreno still being ranked 2nd. Even got people saying the tournament winner between Mares-Agbeko should be the Champ.

No doubt the winner of the tournament will take Moreno's spot at 2nd, as well they should. Even if Moreno doesn't lose against Lorenzo Parra, who's not even ranked by The Ring, and ranked 23rd by Boxrec.

And not like Ward or Froch are going to duck Bute if he ends up beating Kessler. If they were like that, they wouldn't have even taken part in the tournament.

And reason why Bradley-Alexander wasn't for The Ring belt is because Alexander got a gift home town decision against an opponent that Khan spanked. Ring got shit for it, but the fight sucked, Alexander quit, and then Bradley bitches out of fighting Khan, showing his true colors.

IF anything, they are too anal about filling vacancies.
GrantZilla
GrantZilla

Posts : 9310
Join date : 2010-11-05

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  hardcorebee24 Wed Jun 08, 2011 8:46 am

GrantZilla wrote:Fighters have lost ranking position do to inferior competion.

Got same thing going on at Bantam. There are people complaining about Moreno still being ranked 2nd. Even got people saying the tournament winner between Mares-Agbeko should be the Champ.

No doubt the winner of the tournament will take Moreno's spot at 2nd, as well they should. Even if Moreno doesn't lose against Lorenzo Parra, who's not even ranked by The Ring, and ranked 23rd by Boxrec.

And not like Ward or Froch are going to duck Bute if he ends up beating Kessler. If they were like that, they wouldn't have even taken part in the tournament.

And reason why Bradley-Alexander wasn't for The Ring belt is because Alexander got a gift home town decision against an opponent that Khan spanked. Ring got shit for it, but the fight sucked, Alexander quit, and then Bradley bitches out of fighting Khan, showing his true colors.

IF anything, they are too anal about filling vacancies.

I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU"RE SAYING. They chose a funny time to drop Bute is all. Johnson isn't the best or highest ranked guy that Froch has beaten. Bute remained at number 2 when he shouldn't have been according to their own standards. Again you seem to fail to understand what my point is, my point is why now when it could have been two fucking years ago. Bute hasn't fought the competition that Froch has faced in two fucking years!!!!! WHY NOW WHEN HE DEFEATED THE 8th BEST OPPONENT IN THE DIVISION DO THEY DECIDE TO LEAP FROG BUTE!!!!????!!!!???? They could have done it when he beat Taylor, Dirrell, lost a close one to Kessler, or beat Abraham. Seems to me that who ever from the original Super Six made it to the final would have been crowned number one and two to settle the ring belt. In that context I think the Ring is wrong (these rankings may be right) but it is contrived. Bute hasn't done anything less to be dropped to number three and Froch hasn't done anything different than he's already done to be moved up.
hardcorebee24
hardcorebee24

Posts : 3310
Join date : 2010-10-24

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  Guest Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:32 am

Sorry Grant I don't agree with this.

It should be Ward, Bute, Kessler then Froch.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  flapanther2001 Wed Jun 08, 2011 1:25 pm

I like it. Bute is over rated due to his soft resume'. I doubt Froch or Kessler for that matter, would get smacked around by Andrade. Other than Andrade, who has Bute beaten? Froch deserves the #2 spot due to his resume'. After the Super 6 is over, you know Bute will want a fight with the winner for big bucks, so he'll have a chance to be #1.
flapanther2001
flapanther2001

Posts : 2962
Join date : 2010-10-27

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  Guest Wed Jun 08, 2011 1:37 pm

Everyone has a bad night at the office, Manny, Floyd, Sugar Ray, you can't keep shitting on Bute because of the first fight with Andrade, he waxed Andrade in the rematch.

Sure his resume isn't spectacular but there's no doubt Bute is a talented SMW, he's arguably the best body puncher in the sport right now.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  flapanther2001 Wed Jun 08, 2011 1:39 pm

Ali wrote:Everyone has a bad night at the office, Manny, Floyd, Sugar Ray, you can't keep shitting on Bute because of the first fight with Andrade, he waxed Andrade in the rematch.

Sure his resume isn't spectacular but there's no doubt Bute is a talented SMW, he's arguably the best body puncher in the sport right now.
He's looked against much softer competition. The Ring Ranking isn't helping him right now anyway. If anything, moving Froch up helps Bute.
flapanther2001
flapanther2001

Posts : 2962
Join date : 2010-10-27

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  Gumby Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:45 pm

Great news. Makes the finale more meaningful and will give the division a legitimate champion. If someone's better, they can take the belt. Froch and Ward are both deserving of it.
Gumby
Gumby

Posts : 2256
Join date : 2010-10-24

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  flapanther2001 Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:03 pm

Gumby wrote:Great news. Makes the finale more meaningful and will give the division a legitimate champion. If someone's better, they can take the belt. Froch and Ward are both deserving of it.
Exactly...either way, Bute is still in line for a huge payday (with a legit champ) after the winner is crowned.
flapanther2001
flapanther2001

Posts : 2962
Join date : 2010-10-27

Back to top Go down

Ward-Froch for The Ring belt Empty Re: Ward-Froch for The Ring belt

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum