Spinks was leading on two of the scorecards, says the fat man

NJBeatdown86 Sun Jul 01, 2012 12:59 am

Dan Rafael
Get ready to be SICK! At time of stoppage Spinks led 57-56 on Gwen Adair and Robert Byrd cards. Fernando Villarreal had Bundrage up 57-56.

Dan Rafael
Spinks leading on two scorecards and only trailing by one is putrid. PUTRID!!!!!!! And that was with him getting dropped in rd 1!! #boxing

Dan Rafael
Spinks leading? MAYBE he won two of the middle rounds. MAYBE. Other than that he did NOTHING. Bundrage was beating the crap out of him.

Dan Rafael
WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE JUDGING??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Dan Rafael
The scores of the fight were given to me by @GoldenBoyBoxing's PR when I asked for them just to see if anything was funny looking. IT WAS!

powerpuncher Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:05 am

i gave him one round and that was being pretty generous

**GrantZilla** Sun Jul 01, 2012 7:42 am

Maybe it's time to bring back the No Decision days. Judging is a joke and nothing will be done about it

**dmar5143** Sun Jul 01, 2012 7:57 am

GrantZilla wrote:Maybe it's time to bring back the No Decision days. Judging is a joke and nothing will be done about it

...not noo decisons but newspaper decisions.at least the majority of them get it right 98 percent of the time...so much for some thoughts that the judges will mind there ps and qs because of resent controversy..the incompetence is wide spread.roy jones jr got a gift in poland yesterday in the guys own back yard..can it get any worse...yes is the only anser..

**captainanddew** Sun Jul 01, 2012 8:17 am

wasn't scoring it each round

round 1 10-8 bundrage
Bundrage won that round clearly. He destroyed him in the final round. the rounds in between had Bundrage doing too much waiting and not punching.

Rounds 2-6 were rounds where Bundrage was not punching alot and Spinks could have conceivably won the rounds.

But it seems a bit odd to have Spinks winning.

**UBeeg9cats** Sun Jul 01, 2012 5:19 pm

captainanddew wrote:wasn't scoring it each round

round 1 10-8 bundrage
Bundrage won that round clearly. He destroyed him in the final round. the rounds in between had Bundrage doing too much waiting and not punching.

Rounds 2-6 were rounds where Bundrage was not punching alot and Spinks could have conceivably won the rounds.

But it seems a bit odd to have Spinks winning.

I agree. I also didn't score the fight but I didn't see any non-knockdown round where I thought Spinks was completely out of it. Admittedly, I have a soft spot in my heart for a STL guy but it was just an ugly fight all the way around. Spinks initiates a clinch and then K9 decides he can wrestle him out of the clinch.

powerpuncher Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:34 am

i actually wish that more people hit during clinches like k9 did. unless the ref says break, you swing and try to KO your opponent.

**GrantZilla** Mon Jul 02, 2012 3:06 am

dmar5143 wrote:
GrantZilla wrote:Maybe it's time to bring back the No Decision days. Judging is a joke and nothing will be done about it
...not noo decisons but newspaper decisions.at least the majority of them get it right 98 percent of the time...so much for some thoughts that the judges will mind there ps and qs because of resent controversy..the incompetence is wide spread.roy jones jr got a gift in poland yesterday in the guys own back yard..can it get any worse...yes is the only anser..

Don't they pretty much go hand and hand. Reason why we had newspaper decisions is because of the No Decision law that was in place. A law that was made to stop the kind of bullshit that is going on now. Corrupt, incompetant, judges.

I no longer beleive these judges are incompetant. They favor certain promoters. The ones that are paying them. That very conflict of interest should not be allowed but is. They favor certain promoters so they can continue to get big fights from them. So it's not direct bribery, but close enough.

**dmar5143** Mon Jul 02, 2012 6:53 am

good point.yes they go hand and hand in general.

Sponsored content

Spinks was leading on two of the scorecards, says the fat man

Spinks was leading on two of the scorecards, says the fat man

Re: Spinks was leading on two of the scorecards, says the fat man

Re: Spinks was leading on two of the scorecards, says the fat man

Re: Spinks was leading on two of the scorecards, says the fat man

Re: Spinks was leading on two of the scorecards, says the fat man

Re: Spinks was leading on two of the scorecards, says the fat man

Re: Spinks was leading on two of the scorecards, says the fat man

Re: Spinks was leading on two of the scorecards, says the fat man

Re: Spinks was leading on two of the scorecards, says the fat man

Re: Spinks was leading on two of the scorecards, says the fat man