IBF refuse to strip Peterson and order Judah fight
+2
NJBeatdown86
captainanddew
6 posters
Page 1 of 1
IBF refuse to strip Peterson and order Judah fight
Lamont Peterson, who admitted to being implanted with the banned substance synthetic testosterone, will be allowed to keep his IBF junior welterweight title, the New Jersey-based sanctioning body announced Friday.
Peterson, of Washington, D.C., won the IBF and WBA belts in his hometown via controversial split decision from Amir Khan on Dec. 10.
However, less than two weeks before they were scheduled to meet in a multimillion dollar rematch on May 19 in Las Vegas, Peterson tested positive for synthetic testosterone during a random urine test conducted in March by the Las Vegas-based Voluntary Anti-Doping Association (VADA).
In a statement, the IBF said its decision to let Peterson keep the title "is based on the findings reported by an independent physician, certified in internal medicine and endocrinology, retained by the IBF to review Peterson's medical records in relation to the information disclosed in the VADA report released this past May."
During the negotiations for the rematch, Peterson had asked Khan to accept random blood and urine testing conducted by VADA, and Khan accepted. Yet it was Peterson who failed a drug test, forcing the fight to be canceled and putting his career in limbo.
The WBA stripped Peterson in July and reinstated Khan as its titleholder, although Khan was then knocked out in the fourth round by Danny Garcia in their July 14 unification bout, which had been set up only because Khan's rematch with Peterson was canceled.
Complicating matters with the sanctioning bodies was Peterson's disclosure that he had been implanted with testosterone pellets by a doctor in Las Vegas prior to the December fight with Khan. That meant that he fought that bout with a banned substance in his system. Peterson claimed he used it because of a medical condition.
However, the testosterone did not show up in his drug screen conducted by the Washington, D.C., commission for the December fight with Khan because its tests are less sophisticated than the ones used by VADA.
According to the IBF's statement, its independent doctor was asked "to provide an opinion as to whether the levels of testosterone noted in the VADA report appeared to be consistent with the therapeutic use of the hormone, or for performance-enhancing purposes.
Additionally, the physician was asked whether these levels of testosterone would have enhanced Lamont Peterson's training for, and performance during, the bout on Dec. 10, 2011, and for his training for the bout scheduled for May 19, 2012.
"After concluding the review of all the documentation provided by Peterson's camp and the Nevada State Athletic Commission, the physician determined that the testosterone levels noted in the VADA report are consistent with the therapeutic use of the hormone and not for the purpose of performance enhancement.
"Therefore, these levels would not have enhanced Lamont Peterson's training for or performance during the bout on Dec. 10, 2011, nor for his training for the bout that was scheduled for May 19, 2012, as a specimen collected by VADA on April 13, 2012 tested negative on May 2, 2012."
The IBF also ordered that Peterson (30-1-1, 15 KOs) make his mandatory defense against former titleholder Zab Judah (42-7, 29 KOs), who knocked out Vernon Paris in the ninth round on March 24 in an elimination bout to earn the title opportunity.
The Peterson-Judah fight is due to take place by Sept. 10, but because of the time it took to rule on Peterson's status, the IBF ordered the camps to negotiate the bout immediately and said it "is now expected to take place as soon as possible on a date that all parties involved agree upon."
The next meeting of the Nevada State Athletic Commission is Aug. 24, and executive director Keith Kizer said the Peterson camp has asked to be on the agenda, although the agenda has not yet been announced.
Just because the IBF has allowed Peterson to retain his world title does not necessarily mean the Nevada commission, or any other commission, will license him after he admitted to using a banned substance. Peterson did not disclose the usage or seek a therapeutic exemption from Nevada prior to the May fight that was canceled.
Peterson's attorney, Jeff Fried, could not be reached for comment.
http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/8255582/ibf-rules-lamont-peterson-keep-junior-welterweight-belt
These sanctioning bodies will not stop until they bleed this sport dry
Guest- Guest
Re: IBF refuse to strip Peterson and order Judah fight
Ali wrote:Lamont Peterson, who admitted to being implanted with the banned substance synthetic testosterone, will be allowed to keep his IBF junior welterweight title, the New Jersey-based sanctioning body announced Friday.
Peterson, of Washington, D.C., won the IBF and WBA belts in his hometown via controversial split decision from Amir Khan on Dec. 10.
However, less than two weeks before they were scheduled to meet in a multimillion dollar rematch on May 19 in Las Vegas, Peterson tested positive for synthetic testosterone during a random urine test conducted in March by the Las Vegas-based Voluntary Anti-Doping Association (VADA).
In a statement, the IBF said its decision to let Peterson keep the title "is based on the findings reported by an independent physician, certified in internal medicine and endocrinology, retained by the IBF to review Peterson's medical records in relation to the information disclosed in the VADA report released this past May."
During the negotiations for the rematch, Peterson had asked Khan to accept random blood and urine testing conducted by VADA, and Khan accepted. Yet it was Peterson who failed a drug test, forcing the fight to be canceled and putting his career in limbo.
The WBA stripped Peterson in July and reinstated Khan as its titleholder, although Khan was then knocked out in the fourth round by Danny Garcia in their July 14 unification bout, which had been set up only because Khan's rematch with Peterson was canceled.
Complicating matters with the sanctioning bodies was Peterson's disclosure that he had been implanted with testosterone pellets by a doctor in Las Vegas prior to the December fight with Khan. That meant that he fought that bout with a banned substance in his system. Peterson claimed he used it because of a medical condition.
However, the testosterone did not show up in his drug screen conducted by the Washington, D.C., commission for the December fight with Khan because its tests are less sophisticated than the ones used by VADA.
According to the IBF's statement, its independent doctor was asked "to provide an opinion as to whether the levels of testosterone noted in the VADA report appeared to be consistent with the therapeutic use of the hormone, or for performance-enhancing purposes.
Additionally, the physician was asked whether these levels of testosterone would have enhanced Lamont Peterson's training for, and performance during, the bout on Dec. 10, 2011, and for his training for the bout scheduled for May 19, 2012.
"After concluding the review of all the documentation provided by Peterson's camp and the Nevada State Athletic Commission, the physician determined that the testosterone levels noted in the VADA report are consistent with the therapeutic use of the hormone and not for the purpose of performance enhancement.
"Therefore, these levels would not have enhanced Lamont Peterson's training for or performance during the bout on Dec. 10, 2011, nor for his training for the bout that was scheduled for May 19, 2012, as a specimen collected by VADA on April 13, 2012 tested negative on May 2, 2012."
The IBF also ordered that Peterson (30-1-1, 15 KOs) make his mandatory defense against former titleholder Zab Judah (42-7, 29 KOs), who knocked out Vernon Paris in the ninth round on March 24 in an elimination bout to earn the title opportunity.
The Peterson-Judah fight is due to take place by Sept. 10, but because of the time it took to rule on Peterson's status, the IBF ordered the camps to negotiate the bout immediately and said it "is now expected to take place as soon as possible on a date that all parties involved agree upon."
The next meeting of the Nevada State Athletic Commission is Aug. 24, and executive director Keith Kizer said the Peterson camp has asked to be on the agenda, although the agenda has not yet been announced.
Just because the IBF has allowed Peterson to retain his world title does not necessarily mean the Nevada commission, or any other commission, will license him after he admitted to using a banned substance. Peterson did not disclose the usage or seek a therapeutic exemption from Nevada prior to the May fight that was canceled.
Peterson's attorney, Jeff Fried, could not be reached for comment.
http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/8255582/ibf-rules-lamont-peterson-keep-junior-welterweight-belt
These sanctioning bodies will not stop until they bleed this sport dry
that is why fans need to just ignore them.
captainanddew- Posts : 8143
Join date : 2010-10-20
Age : 47
Location : Richmond, Virginia
Re: IBF refuse to strip Peterson and order Judah fight
someone could get a petrified piece of shit, strap it to a random belt, and it would have more meaning than an IBF belt.
captainanddew- Posts : 8143
Join date : 2010-10-20
Age : 47
Location : Richmond, Virginia
Re: IBF refuse to strip Peterson and order Judah fight
Hell, if any of us pay the alpha orgs. enough money, we too could be "world champions". Next time I see an IBF official (or any other org) official at a fight, I'm going to ask them to stop ruining boxing for the fans.
NJBeatdown86- Posts : 1789
Join date : 2011-04-25
Age : 38
Location : Kendall Park, NJ
Re: IBF refuse to strip Peterson and order Judah fight
my wife is creative. I think I will have her make me a "world championship belt" to wear whenever fights are on.
the abc organizations. I think if I had enough money I could get my son's koala bears, Rocky and Jolly ranked in a division. Of course Rocky probably deserves it. He throws a mean uppercut.
the abc organizations. I think if I had enough money I could get my son's koala bears, Rocky and Jolly ranked in a division. Of course Rocky probably deserves it. He throws a mean uppercut.
captainanddew- Posts : 8143
Join date : 2010-10-20
Age : 47
Location : Richmond, Virginia
Re: IBF refuse to strip Peterson and order Judah fight
We need more than the fans ignoring these orgs, we need the media and networks to do it as well.
Guest- Guest
Re: IBF refuse to strip Peterson and order Judah fight
...on this and other forums folks have been saying that for a long time.ill add that the fighters themselves should also ignore them.bottom line at least to me is just enjoy a good matchup.there are several coming and forget the title or word champion.its realy worthless.Ali wrote:We need more than the fans ignoring these orgs, we need the media and networks to do it as well.
in this case here the commision said medicaly it was proven that petterson needed this stuff to correct a medical condition.fine.with that findings in mind someone can understand there descion but a big but is that he forgot to disclose that with the reason i just forgot this was done.that being considered there choice is the wrong choice..again so what.nothing will change untill the proverbial its too late.lets see if next week boxing can reload and shot itself in the foot again.they will.the question is how soon.
dmar5143- Posts : 2248
Join date : 2011-10-06
Age : 81
Re: IBF refuse to strip Peterson and order Judah fight
If Peterson isn't being stripped of the title, what in the hell was the significance of testing him for PEDs in the first place? This makes no sense to me. None.
Frank- Posts : 1930
Join date : 2010-10-21
Age : 48
Re: IBF refuse to strip Peterson and order Judah fight
it makes no sense on so many levels.
he was injected. Told no one about it. Strike 1.
He signed up for testing. Didn't disclose it. Strike 2.
Was told he tested positive. They said just test the B Sample. Didn't disclose anything. Strike 3.
That sounds like a liar, not someone with a legitimate medical condition.
And even if he had a legitimate medical condition, 3 strikes and he's out. He could have told someone.
I still doubt if it was a legitimate medical condition. Normal ratio (per Conte) is around 1:1. He was 3.77 to 1. That sounds like someone that was doping, and would come under the 4 to 1 testing level(which is the bullshit high level that gets you caught), and was suprised because the testing used caught his ass.
Also, if it were legitimate, wouldn't he have come out with a more specific answer. Such as my levels were well below normal (AND GIVE US THE EXACT LEVEL!!!!!) and say that he met with a doctor and the goal level desired was (SOMETHING NORMAL!!!!).
He made a vague statement of I have a medical condition, my levels were low., blah blah blah blah. It sounded like a kid getting caught cheating in one of my wife's classes and making some shit up.
he was injected. Told no one about it. Strike 1.
He signed up for testing. Didn't disclose it. Strike 2.
Was told he tested positive. They said just test the B Sample. Didn't disclose anything. Strike 3.
That sounds like a liar, not someone with a legitimate medical condition.
And even if he had a legitimate medical condition, 3 strikes and he's out. He could have told someone.
I still doubt if it was a legitimate medical condition. Normal ratio (per Conte) is around 1:1. He was 3.77 to 1. That sounds like someone that was doping, and would come under the 4 to 1 testing level(which is the bullshit high level that gets you caught), and was suprised because the testing used caught his ass.
Also, if it were legitimate, wouldn't he have come out with a more specific answer. Such as my levels were well below normal (AND GIVE US THE EXACT LEVEL!!!!!) and say that he met with a doctor and the goal level desired was (SOMETHING NORMAL!!!!).
He made a vague statement of I have a medical condition, my levels were low., blah blah blah blah. It sounded like a kid getting caught cheating in one of my wife's classes and making some shit up.
captainanddew- Posts : 8143
Join date : 2010-10-20
Age : 47
Location : Richmond, Virginia
Re: IBF refuse to strip Peterson and order Judah fight
Ali wrote:We need more than the fans ignoring these orgs, we need the media and networks to do it as well.
We need this board to start ignoring the ABC's first.
Fuck the strap. Enjoy the matchup. If Peterson can even get licensed.
SlickMoney- Posts : 1642
Join date : 2011-03-06
Re: IBF refuse to strip Peterson and order Judah fight
Forget temporarily about whether Lamont actually cheated or not.
Yes, he should have reported it and yes maybe he was masking something else.
But, the condition is one lots of men don't like talking about so maybe he gets bit of pass as far as personal understanding (though never overlooking it on a professional level).
Here's the question I really want answered:
If he wasn't masking something else- and given that his testosterone levels were not elevated- how much of an advantage did he actually have in his fight with Khan?
Yes, he should have reported it and yes maybe he was masking something else.
But, the condition is one lots of men don't like talking about so maybe he gets bit of pass as far as personal understanding (though never overlooking it on a professional level).
Here's the question I really want answered:
If he wasn't masking something else- and given that his testosterone levels were not elevated- how much of an advantage did he actually have in his fight with Khan?
koolkc107- Posts : 170
Join date : 2012-06-16
Similar topics
» WBC strip Andre Ward and order Anthony Dirrell to fight for vacant belt
» WBA order Khan vs. Peterson rematch
» IBF could order Zab Judah vs Victor Ortiz if Mabuza bails
» Garcia/Judah Fight off?
» Now Judah's thinking about declining a Khan fight
» WBA order Khan vs. Peterson rematch
» IBF could order Zab Judah vs Victor Ortiz if Mabuza bails
» Garcia/Judah Fight off?
» Now Judah's thinking about declining a Khan fight
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum