Worst decisions in boxing history

Oscar De La Hoya vs. Felix Sturm

Toney vs Tiberi was the most blatant since I can remember.

The worst I can remember are Castillo-Maywether I, Forbes-Hopkins, DLH-Tito, DLH-Mosley II, Sturm-DLH, Dirrell-Froch, Lara-PW, Abril-Rios, and JMM-PAC III (still thought I & II were bad but not nearly as bad. Also THe Norwood and John desicions were also horrible)

I would hardly call Dirrell vs. Froch highway robbery, Andre did not go to Nottingham and rip the belt from Carl's hands, he tried to steal a decision.

Ali wrote:I would hardly call Dirrell vs. Froch highway robbery, Andre did not go to Nottingham and rip the belt from Carl's hands, he tried to steal a decision.

Froch won 3 rounds at most.

He didn't land any punches let alone clean punches. Rabbit punches dont count.

Diego408 wrote:

Ali wrote:I would hardly call Dirrell vs. Froch highway robbery, Andre did not go to Nottingham and rip the belt from Carl's hands, he tried to steal a decision.

Froch won 3 rounds at most.

I had it 7-5 for Dirrell but he didn't stamp his authority in the fight, like I've said before if Andre had fought with the intensity like he did after the point deduction he'd have walked away the winner.

I will say this. That top 5 list is pretty good.

Oscar-Tito shouldn't be on there. Oscar-Sturm was a robbery.

Williams-Lara was so bad it got the judges fired. Chisora-Helenius was bad too.

What makes the Pac decision more unusual than any other decision I ever seen is the fact that Pacquiao is the biggest star in the sport and Bradley is a virtual unknown.

The only time I saw something like this happen was the "Carlos Zarate - Lupe Pintor" fight. Of course their fight was much closer than Saturday's robbery and Pintor had a lot more fans than Bradley does.

I've honestly never seen anything like Saturday's decision. I think an F.B.I. investigation is warranted. As far as the NSAC is concerned, they've decided not to do anything about the Pac Bradley situation, which I think is terribly embarassing for the sport. I honestly see no reason for their (The NSAC) existence.