Nate Campbell to fight on the Marquez vs Katsidis undercard
5 posters
Page 1 of 1
Nate Campbell to fight on the Marquez vs Katsidis undercard
Former unified lightweight titlist Nate Campbell (33-6-1, 25 KOs), last seen losing a lopsided decision in May to Victor Ortiz in a junior welterweight bout on HBO, will return Nov. 27, adviser Terry Trekas told ESPN.com.
Campbell, who will fight at 137 pounds, is scheduled to face Walter Estrada (37-13-1, 25 KOs) on the undercard of lightweight champ Juan Manuel Marquez's defense against Michael Katsidis at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. Campbell plans to move back down to the lightweight division, despite previous problems making weight.
"He's going back to 135, so I wanted to test him out at 137 first to make sure he's good at the weight," Trekas said.
After the Ortiz fight, Campbell was diagnosed with a sciatic nerve problem, which is what he said gave him trouble in the fight. The upcoming fight is "to get back in the win column and to see how successful the back rehab was," Trekas said. "I had concerns about him going back to 135, but he feels with the back rehab that it now allows him to do the things in camp that he hasn't been able to for the last few fights and that he can now make 135."
http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/columns/story?columnist=rafael_dan&id=5734748
Campbell, who will fight at 137 pounds, is scheduled to face Walter Estrada (37-13-1, 25 KOs) on the undercard of lightweight champ Juan Manuel Marquez's defense against Michael Katsidis at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. Campbell plans to move back down to the lightweight division, despite previous problems making weight.
"He's going back to 135, so I wanted to test him out at 137 first to make sure he's good at the weight," Trekas said.
After the Ortiz fight, Campbell was diagnosed with a sciatic nerve problem, which is what he said gave him trouble in the fight. The upcoming fight is "to get back in the win column and to see how successful the back rehab was," Trekas said. "I had concerns about him going back to 135, but he feels with the back rehab that it now allows him to do the things in camp that he hasn't been able to for the last few fights and that he can now make 135."
http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/columns/story?columnist=rafael_dan&id=5734748
Guest- Guest
Re: Nate Campbell to fight on the Marquez vs Katsidis undercard
HMM interesting. Anyone think that he will be good again at 135?
Re: Nate Campbell to fight on the Marquez vs Katsidis undercard
Nate is done.
Old age and back issues have taken their toll. His last hurrah was the Juan Diaz fight. Since that time he has looked worse in every single fight.
He'd walk away but he's flat broke.
Old age and back issues have taken their toll. His last hurrah was the Juan Diaz fight. Since that time he has looked worse in every single fight.
He'd walk away but he's flat broke.
captainanddew- Posts : 8143
Join date : 2010-10-20
Age : 47
Location : Richmond, Virginia
Re: Nate Campbell to fight on the Marquez vs Katsidis undercard
Soonermark890 wrote:HMM interesting. Anyone think that he will be good again at 135?
I don't think Nate's issue is weight. I think Nate's issue is Father Time targeted him and Father Time is 2,315,627-0-2.
Guest- Guest
Re: Nate Campbell to fight on the Marquez vs Katsidis undercard
Get ready for Guerrero vs Grandpa Nate
gomez1012- Posts : 7452
Join date : 2010-10-22
Re: Nate Campbell to fight on the Marquez vs Katsidis undercard
The way Guerrero looked against an ancient Casamayor I wouldn't be surprised if he lost.
Guest- Guest
Re: Nate Campbell to fight on the Marquez vs Katsidis undercard
maybe nate will be up to one of his greatest moments.its the ill stand still and dare you to take your best shot moment..intelligent move huh.
Guest- Guest
Re: Nate Campbell to fight on the Marquez vs Katsidis undercard
LOL Yeah that damn father time seems unbeatable but BHOP seems to be giving him a good fight.marbleheadmaui wrote:Soonermark890 wrote:HMM interesting. Anyone think that he will be good again at 135?
I don't think Nate's issue is weight. I think Nate's issue is Father Time targeted him and Father Time is 2,315,627-0-2.
Re: Nate Campbell to fight on the Marquez vs Katsidis undercard
I like Nate, but that whole sciatica excuse is garbage. He was outgunned by a younger, stronger, faster guy. Maybe he's got something left in the tank, but, we'll see.
flapanther2001- Posts : 2962
Join date : 2010-10-27
Re: Nate Campbell to fight on the Marquez vs Katsidis undercard
flapanther2001 wrote:I like Nate, but that whole sciatica excuse is garbage. He was outgunned by a younger, stronger, faster guy. Maybe he's got something left in the tank, but, we'll see.
I doubt he has anything left.
Beats Diaz- looked good
Beats Funeka in a close fight (looked so so)
No Contest against Bradley- looked poor
Loses to Ortiz and looks completely faded
each performance since 2008 has gotten worse. Father time has won this battle.
As for BHOP- I believe he sold his soul to the devil
captainanddew- Posts : 8143
Join date : 2010-10-20
Age : 47
Location : Richmond, Virginia
Re: Nate Campbell to fight on the Marquez vs Katsidis undercard
Maybe the devil wants him to be his executioner?captainanddew wrote:flapanther2001 wrote:I like Nate, but that whole sciatica excuse is garbage. He was outgunned by a younger, stronger, faster guy. Maybe he's got something left in the tank, but, we'll see.
I doubt he has anything left.
Beats Diaz- looked good
Beats Funeka in a close fight (looked so so)
No Contest against Bradley- looked poor
Loses to Ortiz and looks completely faded
each performance since 2008 has gotten worse. Father time has won this battle.
As for BHOP- I believe he sold his soul to the devil
Re: Nate Campbell to fight on the Marquez vs Katsidis undercard
Nah....everybody knows the Devil lives in South Philly...Soonermark890 wrote:Maybe the devil wants him to be his executioner?captainanddew wrote:flapanther2001 wrote:I like Nate, but that whole sciatica excuse is garbage. He was outgunned by a younger, stronger, faster guy. Maybe he's got something left in the tank, but, we'll see.
I doubt he has anything left.
Beats Diaz- looked good
Beats Funeka in a close fight (looked so so)
No Contest against Bradley- looked poor
Loses to Ortiz and looks completely faded
each performance since 2008 has gotten worse. Father time has won this battle.
As for BHOP- I believe he sold his soul to the devil
flapanther2001- Posts : 2962
Join date : 2010-10-27
Re: Nate Campbell to fight on the Marquez vs Katsidis undercard
Ali, I have absolutely no interest in watching Nate Campbell fight, but I'm really happy to see you post here.
Frank- Posts : 1930
Join date : 2010-10-21
Age : 47
Re: Nate Campbell to fight on the Marquez vs Katsidis undercard
I thought the devil lived Austin, TX?flapanther2001 wrote:Nah....everybody knows the Devil lives in South Philly...Soonermark890 wrote:Maybe the devil wants him to be his executioner?captainanddew wrote:flapanther2001 wrote:I like Nate, but that whole sciatica excuse is garbage. He was outgunned by a younger, stronger, faster guy. Maybe he's got something left in the tank, but, we'll see.
I doubt he has anything left.
Beats Diaz- looked good
Beats Funeka in a close fight (looked so so)
No Contest against Bradley- looked poor
Loses to Ortiz and looks completely faded
each performance since 2008 has gotten worse. Father time has won this battle.
As for BHOP- I believe he sold his soul to the devil
Similar topics
» Nate Campbell retires...
» Nate Campbell anti gay rant....
» Nate Campbell really is a stubborn old bastard
» Nate Campbell vs Danny Garcia set for April 9th PPV
» Victor Cayo-Nate Campbell Deal Reach For March 24th
» Nate Campbell anti gay rant....
» Nate Campbell really is a stubborn old bastard
» Nate Campbell vs Danny Garcia set for April 9th PPV
» Victor Cayo-Nate Campbell Deal Reach For March 24th
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|