The Boxing Palace
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Winky vs. Kid Chocolate testing confusion

2 posters

Go down

Winky vs. Kid Chocolate testing confusion Empty Winky vs. Kid Chocolate testing confusion

Post  Guest Sat May 26, 2012 8:23 pm

There is quite a bit of confusion brewing in the upcoming middleweight contest between Peter Quillin and Winky Wright, who agreed to do USADA (United States Anti-Doping Agency) testing for their June 2 match at the Home Depot Center in Carson, CA. The bout is part of a quadruple-header on Showtime.

According to Wright, USADA contracts were signed early last week. An exact date is forthcoming but somewhere around May 21 both sides had signed up for more testing. Peter Quillin discussed doing VADA testing on BoxingScene.com's audio show, The Boxing Lab, on Tuesday May 22. This writer tweeted a correction that night that it was in fact USADA testing he was doing.

On May 23, as told to Maxboxing.com’s Steve Kim by Peter Quillin, USADA collected both blood and urine samples to be tested for the Wright fight. On Thursday, Wright gave blood and urine to USADA as well.

“They came to my house at 6 in the morning. They took urine, blood. Everything,” said Wright.

But suddenly, just two days approximately after Quillen’s sample was taken and a day after Wright’s sample was taken, USADA contacted Wright’s lawyer and announced they would not be doing testing after all. The reason given was that USADA did not have the proper time to educate the fighters on what to take and what not to.

"[Ramirez, Wright’s manager] and Damien told me. I don’t understand it. All I’m asking is ‘How do you take urine and take blood and then all of sudden you say you aren’t going to test it?’ Then they tried to make up an excuse and say they wanted to teach us. They ain’t nothing to teach. They took blood, they told us we would take a test and either come up positive or negative. That’s it. What are we doing this for? Are you going to tell me not to take something I don’t need to be taking? That’s cool. All I want to know is we are playing on the same field.”

Wright, wondering what was going on, decided to at least get the samples taken tested. This morning, his lawyer informed him that according to USADA, the samples have all been destroyed.

“They told us that weren’t going to do [testing] two days ago,” said Wright. “So my lawyer called today and asked for it to be tested and they told him today they threw it out.”

It is unclear at press time what the protocol would be in this situation and why USADA, after getting signed contracts and going so far as to take samples, suddenly decided, two days later, to cease testing.

http://www.boxingscene.com/quillin-wright-usada-testing-called-off-confusion-brews--53304

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Winky vs. Kid Chocolate testing confusion Empty Re: Winky vs. Kid Chocolate testing confusion

Post  dmar5143 Sat May 26, 2012 8:39 pm

pathetic.
dmar5143
dmar5143

Posts : 2248
Join date : 2011-10-06
Age : 81

Back to top Go down

Winky vs. Kid Chocolate testing confusion Empty Re: Winky vs. Kid Chocolate testing confusion

Post  captainanddew Sat May 26, 2012 9:07 pm

steve kim and especially gabe montoya of maxboxing have great sources when it comes to testing as they keep getting the new stories.

why even if they didn't have enough time to test didn't they notify the parties before throwing out the samples??
captainanddew
captainanddew

Posts : 8143
Join date : 2010-10-20
Age : 47
Location : Richmond, Virginia

Back to top Go down

Winky vs. Kid Chocolate testing confusion Empty Re: Winky vs. Kid Chocolate testing confusion

Post  Guest Sat May 26, 2012 9:08 pm

captainanddew wrote:steve kim and especially gabe montoya of maxboxing have great sources when it comes to testing as they keep getting the new stories.

why even if they didn't have enough time to test didn't they notify the parties before throwing out the samples??

Do ya think Golden Boy want to avoid another controversay ?

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Winky vs. Kid Chocolate testing confusion Empty Re: Winky vs. Kid Chocolate testing confusion

Post  captainanddew Sat May 26, 2012 9:12 pm

Ali wrote:
captainanddew wrote:steve kim and especially gabe montoya of maxboxing have great sources when it comes to testing as they keep getting the new stories.

why even if they didn't have enough time to test didn't they notify the parties before throwing out the samples??

Do ya think Golden Boy want to avoid another controversay ?

I'm not going to make any strong statements until I hear more about this situation.

It is confusing to me why you would destroy the samples without telling the people who gave the samples. You destroy samples and then tell the people involved 2 days later. That is bizarre to me.

captainanddew
captainanddew

Posts : 8143
Join date : 2010-10-20
Age : 47
Location : Richmond, Virginia

Back to top Go down

Winky vs. Kid Chocolate testing confusion Empty Re: Winky vs. Kid Chocolate testing confusion

Post  dmar5143 Sun May 27, 2012 2:43 pm

i just read a article on max boxing on this topic.first it was winky who asked for the testing.he called golden boy and asked for it and they hemed and hauded etc etc.they said it would be 10 000 and they didnt want to pay for it..winky much to his credit said he would pay for the testing.the rest is pathetic with them destroying the samples.makes you wonder with there phoney excuse..ohh by the way the article states if golden boy does do tesing in the future it would be with thoses guys and not vada..interesting and suspious indeed.
dmar5143
dmar5143

Posts : 2248
Join date : 2011-10-06
Age : 81

Back to top Go down

Winky vs. Kid Chocolate testing confusion Empty Re: Winky vs. Kid Chocolate testing confusion

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum