Freak...How are your rankings made up?

Just curious. You doing them all yourself. Or just kind of doing a consensus with other rankings?

Only MMA rankings I took seriously was Fight! Mag's Compu rankings. They aren't UFC bias. Sherdog's rankings are a joke.

They are mine. Sherdog's rankings are a big joke and that's why I took them down when Ali posted them. I'd rather everyone here vote and we use them but I don't think enough people would vote. Let me know if you'd be interested in voting and I'll put up a thread.

Naw, you seem like you know your shit when it comes to MMA.

But yeah, I realize Sherdog's rankings were a disgrace when they had Lesnor as the # 1 HW over Fedor. This was before Fedor went downhill.

Thanks man. Yeah that was a joke. I go mostly on actual results and not on hypothetical situations. Like a lot of people have Carwin ahead of Brock yet Brock beat him fair and square and people have Hendo in the top 3 yet the only top 10 guy he has beat in the past 3 years at LHW is Cavalcante.

That's how rankings should be made up.

I think we should do the same for boxing rankings if The Ring rankings turn into Sherdog style, with instead UFC bias a GB one.

Not happy at all with The Ring. But it's a wait and see approach as of right now.

I agree with you. It also makes this site more legit having their own rankings instead of relying on others. Shows what the posters knowledge is. If they are good enough then other sites would use our rankings.

Yeah, just until now The Ring rankings was kind of unverisally used. But as said, minute it starts looking like Sherdog's, I think we should do our own.

Yeah I fully agree. When you think they are starting to slip just say the word and we'll try to get people here to vote on them instead.