Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
+2
hardcorebee24
gomez1012
6 posters
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
http://twitter.com/#!/stevemaxboxing/status/32251442307796992OK, R.Schaefer has confirmed that Lamont Peterson is back in the mix to face Amir Khan on April 16th.
http://twitter.com/#!/stevemaxboxing/status/32251609387892737Also, the proposed date of a Khan-Bradley fight is July 30th, according to Mr Schaefer
gomez1012- Posts : 7452
Join date : 2010-10-22
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
This is great if it happens. That means Khan will have fought ranked opponents in 5 of his 6 bouts at 140. That's a very impressive resume if it comes to fruition.
hardcorebee24- Posts : 3310
Join date : 2010-10-24
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
Hopefully comes through
gomez1012- Posts : 7452
Join date : 2010-10-22
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
And Amir's dad wants Junior Witter
http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&opt=printable&id=35444
http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&opt=printable&id=35444
"Junior is on our list. He's an ex-world champion who lost a split to Tim Bradley, who Amir hopes to fight. So no one can criticise his pedigree," said Shah Khan to The Sun.
gomez1012- Posts : 7452
Join date : 2010-10-22
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
Are you kiddin' me? Bradley destroyed Peterson already, plus the world saw Ortiz spank him regardless of the judges scores. He's clearly not on that level. Khan would UD him easily. He's not a threat. They should make Alexander fight Peterson & force the promoters to sit next to each other & listen as they yell "pop" every time they throw a punch. It would be annoyance in stereo.
flapanther2001- Posts : 2962
Join date : 2010-10-27
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
gomez1012 wrote:And Amir's dad wants Junior Witter
http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&opt=printable&id=35444"Junior is on our list. He's an ex-world champion who lost a split to Tim Bradley, who Amir hopes to fight. So no one can criticise his pedigree," said Shah Khan to The Sun.
He's semi-retired. Stupid fight. Only way i see this is if Khan gets beat badly in his next outing.
hardcorebee24- Posts : 3310
Join date : 2010-10-24
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
flapanther2001 wrote:Are you kiddin' me? Bradley destroyed Peterson already, plus the world saw Ortiz spank him regardless of the judges scores. He's clearly not on that level. Khan would UD him easily. He's not a threat. They should make Alexander fight Peterson & force the promoters to sit next to each other & listen as they yell "pop" every time they throw a punch. It would be annoyance in stereo.
It's a great stay busy for Bradley.
hardcorebee24- Posts : 3310
Join date : 2010-10-24
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
flapanther2001 wrote:Are you kiddin' me? Bradley destroyed Peterson already, plus the world saw Ortiz spank him regardless of the judges scores. He's clearly not on that level. Khan would UD him easily. He's not a threat. They should make Alexander fight Peterson & force the promoters to sit next to each other & listen as they yell "pop" every time they throw a punch. It would be annoyance in stereo.
seriously, only female tennis players should be allowed to do this
gomez1012- Posts : 7452
Join date : 2010-10-22
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
You telling me you'd want to see Bradley face Peterson again?hardcorebee24 wrote:flapanther2001 wrote:Are you kiddin' me? Bradley destroyed Peterson already, plus the world saw Ortiz spank him regardless of the judges scores. He's clearly not on that level. Khan would UD him easily. He's not a threat. They should make Alexander fight Peterson & force the promoters to sit next to each other & listen as they yell "pop" every time they throw a punch. It would be annoyance in stereo.
It's a great stay busy for Bradley.
flapanther2001- Posts : 2962
Join date : 2010-10-27
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
flapanther2001 wrote:You telling me you'd want to see Bradley face Peterson again?hardcorebee24 wrote:flapanther2001 wrote:Are you kiddin' me? Bradley destroyed Peterson already, plus the world saw Ortiz spank him regardless of the judges scores. He's clearly not on that level. Khan would UD him easily. He's not a threat. They should make Alexander fight Peterson & force the promoters to sit next to each other & listen as they yell "pop" every time they throw a punch. It would be annoyance in stereo.
It's a great stay busy for Bradley.
I meant Khan, sorry. I wouldn't want to pay for it but to fight a ranked guy as an interim fight I have no problem with.
hardcorebee24- Posts : 3310
Join date : 2010-10-24
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
OK...I get that, but I don't get Peterson deserving a title shot with Khan.hardcorebee24 wrote:flapanther2001 wrote:You telling me you'd want to see Bradley face Peterson again?hardcorebee24 wrote:flapanther2001 wrote:Are you kiddin' me? Bradley destroyed Peterson already, plus the world saw Ortiz spank him regardless of the judges scores. He's clearly not on that level. Khan would UD him easily. He's not a threat. They should make Alexander fight Peterson & force the promoters to sit next to each other & listen as they yell "pop" every time they throw a punch. It would be annoyance in stereo.
It's a great stay busy for Bradley.
I meant Khan, sorry. I wouldn't want to pay for it but to fight a ranked guy as an interim fight I have no problem with.
flapanther2001- Posts : 2962
Join date : 2010-10-27
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
flapanther2001 wrote:
OK...I get that, but I don't get Peterson deserving a title shot with Khan.
What would your solution be? We say they don't fight enough but when they schedule fights we don't approve of we complain. We want to ignore the straps but we ask why one guys deserves a title shot. We only want to use the Ring as the recognized belt, this fight wouldn't be for the Ring Belt. If he's definitely going to fight Bradley and the contracts are signed then I have zero issue with him fighting Peterson
hardcorebee24- Posts : 3310
Join date : 2010-10-24
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
junior witter really wasn't all he was cranked up to be anyway. he literally did make a career out of calling out Ricky Hatton so everybody rated him. he really wasn't that good
dbudge- Posts : 2170
Join date : 2010-11-14
Location : London, England
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
Well, to answer your question, I feel that once a fighter achieves that level of success that he should remain on that level. Khan & Bradley should be made. Ortiz should be lobbying for a Maidana rematch so he can get a title shot. I don't see Witter in the mix since both Bradley & Alexander have beaten him, but if he can beat a 140 lb. contender like Judah, Matthysse or Mabuza, he can work his way back in.hardcorebee24 wrote:flapanther2001 wrote:
OK...I get that, but I don't get Peterson deserving a title shot with Khan.
What would your solution be? We say they don't fight enough but when they schedule fights we don't approve of we complain. We want to ignore the straps but we ask why one guys deserves a title shot. We only want to use the Ring as the recognized belt, this fight wouldn't be for the Ring Belt. If he's definitely going to fight Bradley and the contracts are signed then I have zero issue with him fighting Peterson
flapanther2001- Posts : 2962
Join date : 2010-10-27
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
Khan vs Peterson is a lame, boring fight but I guess its fine if he fights Bradley next. I'd rather he fight Ortiz next because at least he would have the power to make it interesting. I know Ortiz is in talks to fight Berto though so whatever.
kbyte- Posts : 730
Join date : 2010-10-28
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
hardcorebee24 wrote:This is great if it happens. That means Khan will have fought ranked opponents in 5 of his 6 bouts at 140. That's a very impressive resume if it comes to fruition.
Yeah I agree. This fight as a stay busy fight is more than adequate.
Guest- Guest
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
flapanther2001 wrote:Well, to answer your question, I feel that once a fighter achieves that level of success that he should remain on that level. Khan & Bradley should be made. Ortiz should be lobbying for a Maidana rematch so he can get a title shot. I don't see Witter in the mix since both Bradley & Alexander have beaten him, but if he can beat a 140 lb. contender like Judah, Matthysse or Mabuza, he can work his way back in.hardcorebee24 wrote:flapanther2001 wrote:
OK...I get that, but I don't get Peterson deserving a title shot with Khan.
What would your solution be? We say they don't fight enough but when they schedule fights we don't approve of we complain. We want to ignore the straps but we ask why one guys deserves a title shot. We only want to use the Ring as the recognized belt, this fight wouldn't be for the Ring Belt. If he's definitely going to fight Bradley and the contracts are signed then I have zero issue with him fighting Peterson
I agree that a Witter fight is pointless. The only reason I see that fight is because they're English. Khan against any of the other three you mentioned is also acceptable.
hardcorebee24- Posts : 3310
Join date : 2010-10-24
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
Nice, keeps Khan facing a top Jr Welterweight instead of Lightweights and unknowns.
And Jr Witter would've have knocked Ricky Hatton out when he was a trinket holder in the divison.
And Jr Witter would've have knocked Ricky Hatton out when he was a trinket holder in the divison.
Guest- Guest
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
marbleheadmaui wrote:hardcorebee24 wrote:This is great if it happens. That means Khan will have fought ranked opponents in 5 of his 6 bouts at 140. That's a very impressive resume if it comes to fruition.
Yeah I agree. This fight as a stay busy fight is more than adequate.
This is the kind of fight Adamek should be looking for, not some bum who beat an ancient version of Tyson.
Guest- Guest
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
Ali wrote:marbleheadmaui wrote:hardcorebee24 wrote:This is great if it happens. That means Khan will have fought ranked opponents in 5 of his 6 bouts at 140. That's a very impressive resume if it comes to fruition.
Yeah I agree. This fight as a stay busy fight is more than adequate.
This is the kind of fight Adamek should be looking for, not some bum who beat an ancient version of Tyson.
Stay busy fights are just that, stay busy fights. I'll give an established guy a lot of latitude if he's fighting frequently.
Guest- Guest
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
marbleheadmaui wrote:Ali wrote:marbleheadmaui wrote:hardcorebee24 wrote:This is great if it happens. That means Khan will have fought ranked opponents in 5 of his 6 bouts at 140. That's a very impressive resume if it comes to fruition.
Yeah I agree. This fight as a stay busy fight is more than adequate.
This is the kind of fight Adamek should be looking for, not some bum who beat an ancient version of Tyson.
Stay busy fights are just that, stay busy fights. I'll give an established guy a lot of latitude if he's fighting frequently.
Yeah but they're pointless if the opponent is complete bum who benefits you in no way, Adamek's already had his fair share of keep busy fights with poor opponents eg Maddalone, Grant.
Guest- Guest
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
Ali wrote:marbleheadmaui wrote:Ali wrote:marbleheadmaui wrote:hardcorebee24 wrote:This is great if it happens. That means Khan will have fought ranked opponents in 5 of his 6 bouts at 140. That's a very impressive resume if it comes to fruition.
Yeah I agree. This fight as a stay busy fight is more than adequate.
This is the kind of fight Adamek should be looking for, not some bum who beat an ancient version of Tyson.
Stay busy fights are just that, stay busy fights. I'll give an established guy a lot of latitude if he's fighting frequently.
Yeah but they're pointless if the opponent is complete bum who benefits you in no way, Adamek's already had his fair share of keep busy fights with poor opponents eg Maddalone, Grant.
He's a lightheavy/cruiser that moved up, he beat Arreola and Estrada and fought a guy like Grant to get ready for the size of Wlad. He fights five times a year and two of which were established heavies. He's fighting and building a base and staying in shape.
hardcorebee24- Posts : 3310
Join date : 2010-10-24
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
Sell it all you want but the fight is a complete joke, they had a Samuel Peter fight on the table and opted for a complete bum.
Guest- Guest
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
Ali wrote:Sell it all you want but the fight is a complete joke, they had a Samuel Peter fight on the table and opted for a complete bum.
With good reason, a signed deal for a HW title shot in the fall
McBride is tall and a far less risk than Peter
gomez1012- Posts : 7452
Join date : 2010-10-22
Re: Schaefer: Lamont back in play vs Khan, then Bradley 7/30
gomez1012 wrote:Ali wrote:Sell it all you want but the fight is a complete joke, they had a Samuel Peter fight on the table and opted for a complete bum.
With good reason, a signed deal for a HW title shot in the fall
McBride is tall and a far less risk than Peter
They could have done alot better than Kevin freaking McBride, he's won one fight in five years.
Guest- Guest
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Schaefer: Khan might have the best chin in boxing
» Lamont Peterson now in the running to face Khan in England
» Amir Khan vs. Lamont Peterson teh weigh-in pictures
» how would Ortiz vs Khan play out?
» Khan get's WBA trinket back? WTF
» Lamont Peterson now in the running to face Khan in England
» Amir Khan vs. Lamont Peterson teh weigh-in pictures
» how would Ortiz vs Khan play out?
» Khan get's WBA trinket back? WTF
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|