Cunningham vs Adamek

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  flapanther2001 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:03 pm

Is on NBC....who's watching?
avatar
flapanther2001

Posts : 2962
Join date : 2010-10-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  NJBeatdown86 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:25 pm

Adamek is looking way too slow, especially now that Cunningham is throwing a real jab.
avatar
NJBeatdown86

Posts : 1789
Join date : 2011-04-25
Age : 31
Location : Kendall Park, NJ

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  Norm1023 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:44 pm

I have it 5-3 Cunningham.
avatar
Norm1023

Posts : 467
Join date : 2010-11-07
Age : 46
Location : New Hampshire

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  flapanther2001 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:47 pm

Nazim has made a difference so far.
avatar
flapanther2001

Posts : 2962
Join date : 2010-10-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  Norm1023 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:53 pm

6-5 Cunningham. Close fight.
avatar
Norm1023

Posts : 467
Join date : 2010-11-07
Age : 46
Location : New Hampshire

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  NJBeatdown86 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:57 pm

I have it 7-5 Cunningham.
avatar
NJBeatdown86

Posts : 1789
Join date : 2011-04-25
Age : 31
Location : Kendall Park, NJ

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  Norm1023 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:57 pm

I had Cunningham 115-113
avatar
Norm1023

Posts : 467
Join date : 2010-11-07
Age : 46
Location : New Hampshire

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  flapanther2001 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:59 pm

Another bullshit score.
avatar
flapanther2001

Posts : 2962
Join date : 2010-10-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  NJBeatdown86 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:59 pm

WTF with those scores?

115-112?
avatar
NJBeatdown86

Posts : 1789
Join date : 2011-04-25
Age : 31
Location : Kendall Park, NJ

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  NJBeatdown86 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:00 pm

I can see 6-6, but anything more for Adamek is BS.

He doesn't have much of a chance against Pulev, IMO.
avatar
NJBeatdown86

Posts : 1789
Join date : 2011-04-25
Age : 31
Location : Kendall Park, NJ

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  captainanddew on Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:04 pm

I had it 8-4 for Cunningham.

don't see adamek winning 8 rounds.

_________________
I can not live without books
Winter is Coming

avatar
captainanddew

Posts : 8143
Join date : 2010-10-20
Age : 40
Location : Richmond, Virginia

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  dmar5143 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:06 pm

flapanther2001 wrote:Another bullshit score.
.. i agree.cunninhams jab was there all night.great ring generalship and good right hand counters.8-4 cunninham and with a little benefit of the doubt 10-2 cunninham.roach and the other guy were terribe today..adamek the last ten seconds for 3 rounds threw 8 or so punches missed most and you give him the round while the other guy boxed his ears off..
avatar
dmar5143

Posts : 2248
Join date : 2011-10-06
Age : 74

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  Norm1023 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:07 pm

How would a judge get a 115-112 score? Did they score a 10-8 round?
avatar
Norm1023

Posts : 467
Join date : 2010-11-07
Age : 46
Location : New Hampshire

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  dmar5143 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:09 pm

Norm1023 wrote:How would a judge get a 115-112 score? Did they score a 10-8 round?
...they cant add.was that the card first called 115-115...no way adamek can close to wining 8 rounds.
avatar
dmar5143

Posts : 2248
Join date : 2011-10-06
Age : 74

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  flapanther2001 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:11 pm

Fargin' ridiculous!!!
avatar
flapanther2001

Posts : 2962
Join date : 2010-10-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  Bane on Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:12 pm

Adamek gifted another decision No

Bane

Posts : 4
Join date : 2012-12-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  dmar5143 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:14 pm

i think we should conduct a class on judgin g fights 101..90 percent of thoses clowns of late would fail.
avatar
dmar5143

Posts : 2248
Join date : 2011-10-06
Age : 74

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  dmar5143 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:19 pm

get ride of roach now.he gives no insite like stewart or a intelligent analasis..nazim did and he was a cornerman..have naz as a comentater if you need a trainer doing that.freddie brings nothing to the table.
avatar
dmar5143

Posts : 2248
Join date : 2011-10-06
Age : 74

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  captainanddew on Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:21 pm

this fight demonstrated a few things:

1-Judges love aggression. The effective part is left out unfortunately.
2-The bigger name/hometown/cash cow is going to get bullshit decisions. Adamek makes more money for the sport than Cunningham does.

Cunningham vs adamek-boxer vs aggressive fighter who is the bigger name- bigger name wins
Abril vs Rios- same story

on and on- they reward aggression and in fights where aggression isn't the issue they'll give rounds to the bigger name guy anyway.

total bullshit.

_________________
I can not live without books
Winter is Coming

avatar
captainanddew

Posts : 8143
Join date : 2010-10-20
Age : 40
Location : Richmond, Virginia

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  dmar5143 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:23 pm

it seems that way captain..agression needs to be effective..adamek was not..far from it..again judging has gone downhill a lot..
avatar
dmar5143

Posts : 2248
Join date : 2011-10-06
Age : 74

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  captainanddew on Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:24 pm

dmar5143 wrote:get ride of roach now.he gives no insite like stewart or a intelligent analasis..nazim did and he was a cornerman..have naz as a comentater if you need a trainer doing that.freddie brings nothing to the table.

you have the parkinson's which is an issue for him. And he doesn't give very good analysis.

naazim's little bit was better than anything freddie said all night.

when we talk about trainers giving great analysis during a fight, cyclops (the banished sarmiento brother) is amazing. His advice during the first PW fight was always spot on. One instruction in between rounds. Usually specific as to what shot to look to use and how. Look for the right hook upstairs. Great job with the right upstairs, don't forget that a right to the body is effective against him. Look for the lead left to the head.

_________________
I can not live without books
Winter is Coming

avatar
captainanddew

Posts : 8143
Join date : 2010-10-20
Age : 40
Location : Richmond, Virginia

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  captainanddew on Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:26 pm

dmar5143 wrote:it seems that way captain..agression needs to be effective..adamek was not..far from it..again judging has gone downhill a lot..

many of the controversial decisions involve the same pardigm:

aggressive fighter wading in, not being that effective, but still getting rounds because he was coming forward. Often seen when that fighter is the bigger name guy.

I'd say I'm cynical but it seems to be rather true.

_________________
I can not live without books
Winter is Coming

avatar
captainanddew

Posts : 8143
Join date : 2010-10-20
Age : 40
Location : Richmond, Virginia

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  dmar5143 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:28 pm

your not cynical just giving reasons for poor judging.
avatar
dmar5143

Posts : 2248
Join date : 2011-10-06
Age : 74

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  Diego408 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:04 pm

I thought Cunningham got screwed. I thought he clearly won the fight. Adamek may have been more aggressive through out the fight, but clearly Cunningham was more affective and landed the better punches. Adamek did get the gift desicion. Even in the first fight, I though Adamek won but te scorecards were wide when they shouldn't have been.
avatar
Diego408

Posts : 2646
Join date : 2010-11-10
Age : 28
Location : Gilroy & Chico, CA

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  NJBeatdown86 on Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:46 pm

That idiot judge needs to go in front of the PSAC and explain how she got 115-112. I feel bad for Cunningham, I'm a huge Adamek fan, but Steve clearly won and didn't deserve to get treated like that. Second bogus decision Adamek won this year.
avatar
NJBeatdown86

Posts : 1789
Join date : 2011-04-25
Age : 31
Location : Kendall Park, NJ

Back to top Go down

Re: Cunningham vs Adamek

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum